# Compare result between Pumas and other other software

**URL:** <https://discourse.pumas.ai/t/compare-result-between-pumas-and-other-other-software/823>\
**Category:** Estimation\
**Created:** [February 4, 2023, 5:03am UTC](https://discourse.pumas.ai/t/compare-result-between-pumas-and-other-other-software/823 "2023-02-04T05:03:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShinI](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/7ab992/32.png) [@ShinI](https://discourse.pumas.ai/u/ShinI)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2023, 5:03am UTC](https://discourse.pumas.ai/t/compare-result-between-pumas-and-other-other-software/823/1 "2023-02-04T05:03:36Z")

</div>

To share some results.  
population PK analysis: 2 compounds had a same estimation with NONMEM.  
NCA → BE analysis : 2 study result matched to WinNonlin + SAS result.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jogagobburu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3e96dc/32.png) [@jogagobburu](https://discourse.pumas.ai/u/jogagobburu)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2023, 12:28pm UTC](https://discourse.pumas.ai/t/compare-result-between-pumas-and-other-other-software/823/2 "2023-02-04T12:28:03Z")

</div>

Dear @ShinI - Thank you for sharing your independent experience using Pumas software. We are receiving similar feedback from other users, including our own extensive testing.  
J